President Donald J. Trump directed you in his Executive Order of 4 February 2025, to provide a Report on US membership in UNESCO and UNICEF within 90 days (due date: 5 May 2025). I have been unable to locate your Report although that date has passed.

It is my sincere hope that the Report’s conclusion and evaluation is that US membership in UNESCO and UNICEF, like membership in every other part of the UN, is in direct conflict with the interests of the US. Similarly, it is my hope that your recommendation after your 180 day review of US membership in all international bodies (which includes the United Nations), also directed by President Trump’s Executive Order, will similarly conclude that only complete withdrawal from the UN and all of its component parts, programs, protocols, and partnerships can serve US interests.

Please provide a copy of the May 5th Report to me or a link to its location on the Department of State website, in the Federal Register or elsewhere.

The monumental historical opportunity and responsibility allows you to impact US foreign and domestic policy profoundly, making America’s Body Politic Healthy Again.

Withdrawal from all UN-related organizations is consistent with US interests while continuing membership in them is not. Following your recommendation, the essential next step is a comprehensive review of all embedded UN-related policies, protocols, procedures, and practices, and their replacement with US-centric ones. The destructive impact of membership in the UN and its component organizations, which is so deeply antithetical to US interests, is manifested through the infiltration of regulatory and procedural practices at every level of governance, necessitating their complete removal if withdrawal from these organisations is to have anything other than ceremonial significance.

The Department of State is the depository of record for treaty and agreement documents and documentation. Both Department of State and US policy is to adhere to the Vienna Conference on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), which clearly says that treaties can only be concluded between sovereign states. The UN and its agencies cannot enter into or conclude treaty obligations although the UN Charter and WHO Constitution were falsely presented as such to Congress. That means that the Department of State is currently serving as the depository of fraudulent documents under both domestic and international law.

Therefore, in addition to careful examination and “house cleaning” of UN control mechanisms inserted into US structure, explicit abrogation and nullification of all provisions and protocols memorialized in fraudulent UN-related “treaties” must be accomplished to cleanse the US of the impact of membership in these repudiated organizations.

I look forward to supporting and celebrating your leadership in removing the UN yoke from the US in order to re-establish the supremacy of the rule of Constitutional Law in this country. I look forward equally to supporting and celebrating your leadership in removing UN control from every aspect of US governance and function in order to make withdrawal from this organization and its component parts a reality.

Your vital role in advancing American health is crucial for the well-being of our nation. It is imperative to eliminate the detrimental influences of the World Health Organization (WHO) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to fulfill this mission, and you possess the unique qualifications to drive this change.

The pervasive influence of WHO is deeply interwoven within various aspects of HHS operations. Despite being portrayed as a beneficial and evidence-based entity, adhering to WHO guidelines poses the most significant threat to the health of the United States.

WHO’s agenda revolves around surveillance, dominance, and control, and the American populace’s well-being stands to gain significantly from discontinuing our compliance with WHO policies, initiatives, frameworks, and conventions, including adherence to the International Health Regulations (IHR), all pandemic preparedness strategies, the One Health approach, and the seemingly “voluntary” standards of Codex Alimentarius.

Since President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from WHO through an Executive Order in February 2025, you, as the Secretary of HHS, have a golden opportunity and the necessary authority to enforce the President’s directive by dismantling all WHO-related policies, programs, bureaucratic structures, organizational affiliations, and procedures within your agency.

As a relentless advocate for truth and impactful reform, the expectation is that you will disentangle American healthcare and health policy from the widespread influence of this global entity that prioritizes interests other than the health and welfare of the American populace.

United Nations Agencies and programs are contrary to US interests, the Constitution and US sovereignty.  Eighty years of participation and countless wasted dollars have demonstrated their destructive impact on every aspect of our Nation’s life. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to immediately withdraw the United States from the UN and all its agencies, programs and operations.

Considering the Executive Order of February 4, 2025, requiring the Secretary of State and the United Nations Ambassador to review and report to you on international bodies “to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed”, I strongly believe that the UN and its subsidiary organizations are antithetical to the interests of the United States, violating the inalienable rights of citizens of the United States.  There is no meaningful way to reform, reorganize or reconstitute an avowedly Marxist system focused on instituting a One World Government hegemony, thereby subjugating the sovereignty and principles of the United States. Withdrawing this country is the only logical action for you to take.

I urge you to consider the following:

Although the UN consistently presents itself as merely advisory, benign and helpful, the sinister reality is a rapidly evolving implementation of comprehensive world domination. This is clearly evidenced by its own assertions and directives (see, for example, Pact for the Future, Declaration on Future Generations, United Nations 2.0, Agenda 2030/Sustainable Development Goals, Global Digital Compact, UNDRIP, 15 minute cities, WHO and One Health, Pandemic Preparedness and Response Protocol, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, Gender Ideology, etc., etc.)

Indeed, the UN foundational Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself stands in direct opposition to the very existence of our inalienable rights and a representative form of government — see particularly Article 29:

“These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

The UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have a long-standing partnership to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030 for Sustainable [sic] Development, which includes Agenda 2030’s vision of climate change [sic], health [sic], digital cooperation [sic], gender equality [sic], education [sic], and skills [sic]. The fundamental principle upon which this comprehensive reorganization of society is based is naked Marxism. According to both the UN and the WEF, human rights are a useless relic of the past, most of the population of the world is “unnecessary”, and easily replaced by machines. Clearly this is incompatible with the interests of the people of the United States who have been given no opportunity to oppose the UN destruction of their society and the alteration of their genetics.

Agenda 2030 is a comprehensive plan to reshape and/or destroy every facet of human society and, indeed, the genetic integrity of humanity itself, implementing total world domination, control, and ownership. Through specialized corporations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), International Labor Organization (ILO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), no aspect of private, political or community life remains intact once Agenda 2030 is implemented.

The UN Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) is incompatible with our Constitutional Rights. The UNDHR sets forth ‘rights’ or ‘freedoms’ and allows restrictions on the same, ‘as provided by law’ – there are no inalienable rights under the UN system, contrary to the provisions of the US Constitution, such as Amendment One, which prohibits any law restricting freedoms of speech, religion, petition and assembly.

The US Senate ‘Consent’ to the UN Charter (1945), although deceptively presented as a Treaty, actually binds the US to nothing. The US relationship with the UN is unconstitutional and thus ultra vires. The President may, by unilateral act, withdraw from the UN. The UN Charter is not a treaty binding the United States as part of the Supreme Law of the Land.

Logic, reason and law require you, Mr. President, to conclude that withdrawing immediately from the UN is essential to protect the sovereignty and integrity of the US from all UN programs and agencies. The entire UN organization and its programs are contrary to the interests of the United States and cannot be reorganized, reconstituted or reformed to our benefit.

I urge you to oppose Casey Means’ nomination as Surgeon General in order to protect the health of America.

Ms. Means, who is no longer a licensed physician, is a strong advocate of biometric surveillance and transhumanism. After quitting her residency training program, she founded two companies promoting biomedical surveillance and transhumanism, which she currently owns. Means is the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of “Levels”, a company which sells trans-cutaneous continuous glucose monitors and is involved in her brother’s company, Truemed, which sells supplements, fitness equipment and tracking devices online.

Her enthusiasm for transhumanism and participation in its popularization alone should disqualify her to lead our Public Health efforts. Her lack of clinical experience and the blurring of lines between medical care and marketing are further indications of established conflicts of interest and poor judgement.

Help protect America’s health and privacy by rejecting this ill-conceived and dangerous nomination for the important post of America’s Surgeon General.