DOCUMENTS
This page provides access to some of the foundational principles which help guide the actions of Prevent Genocide 2030. Please feel free to make wide use of these materials.
letter to congress to exit the unHeading
Innovation and Investment
Letter to Congress to EXIT the UN
Heading
EXitUN Talking Points
Heading
Unalienable Rights
Top Ten Reasons to Leave the WHO
Heading
Top 10 Reasons to Oppose the Pandemic Treaty
Heading
The Abolition of the Parent
Three Reasons for a chat with
Dr. Bonnie Henry
BC Health Minister Adrian Dix
BC Premier David Eby
mm
m
Connie’s Letter to the Premiers
Dear Premiers Ford, Legault, King, Houston, Higgs, Kinew, Eby, Moe, Smith, Fury, Simpson, Pillai, Akeeagok,
I am a Canadian, born and raised in Aberta seven decades ago. I have never been more concerned than I am today of where our country is headed. I would appreciate a response from each of you, my question is will you take action to Stop Bill C-293?
I am writing to express my grave concerns regarding Bill C-293: An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness, and the significant risks it poses to Canadian sovereignty and the jurisdictional balance between federal and provincial governments. While the goal of improving pandemic preparedness is important, this bill represents jurisdictional overreach that could undermine provincial authority and the freedoms of all Canadians.
It opens the door to serious concerns about the erosion of Canadian sovereignty, the potential for the creation of a command economy, and the influence of foreign entities on Canada’s domestic policies.
Health, agriculture, and natural resources have traditionally been under provincial jurisdiction, yet this bill empowers the federal government, through the Minister of Health and other federal departments, to impose policies and regulations that affect these domains. The bill’s broad and undefined terms, such as pandemic risk and One Health approach, allow for far-reaching federal intervention, including the regulation of activities in agriculture, land use, and commercial sectors, which are typically areas of provincial control.
This undermines the spirit of federalism and the division of powers enshrined in the Canadian Constitution.
In addition to jurisdictional overreach, Bill C-293 potentially opens the door to judicial overreach. The bill mandates Canada to conform to international standards set by bodies like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Health Organization (WHO), effectively outsourcing Canadian public health and economic policy decisions to foreign organizations. This means that Canadians may be subject to global judicial frameworks and rulings from bodies with no direct accountability to Canadian citizens.
The bill’s reliance on the One Health approach, which integrates the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems may sound reasonable but comes with the risk of allowing international standards to dictate what Canadians can eat, how we use our land, and how we conduct our industries, all in the name of pandemic preparedness.
Aligning Canadian policies with global metrics developed by foreign entities like UNEP, is effectively opening the door for Canada to adopt policies that might not prioritize our national interests.
This judicially undefined scope, without specific definitions or terms of what constitutes a pandemic threat sets a dangerous precedent for unaccountable governance.
As Premier, I urge you to recognize that Bill C-293 represents a fundamental challenge to the constitutional division of powers and provincial autonomy. You and your fellow Premiers possess the ability to take legal action to challenge this bill under the Canadian Constitution, particularly through Section 92, which outlines the provincial jurisdiction over health and agriculture. Here are potential legal avenues:
- Constitutional Challenge: Premiers can file a legal challenge in the courts, arguing that Bill C-293 exceeds the federal government’s powers by encroaching on provincial jurisdiction, specifically over public health, agriculture, and environmental policy.
- Intergovernmental Agreements: Premiers can band together to refuse cooperation with federal mandates that are not aligned with provincial interests or autonomy. Premiers can also insist on intergovernmental agreements that secure provincial control over key elements of any pandemic preparedness strategy.
- Section 33 (Notwithstanding Clause): While typically used for civil liberties issues, Premiers may explore options to invoke the Notwithstanding Clause if any elements of Bill C-293 infringe on provincial autonomy or constitutionally protected rights.
Collaboration to Protect Canadian Sovereignty
This is not a partisan issue; it is a matter of protecting Canada’s sovereignty and preventing the erosion of provincial powers. I implore you to unite with your fellow Premiers, irrespective of political affiliation, to take a stand on behalf of Canadians. Together, you can challenge the overreach of this bill through legal action and assert the rights of provinces to govern their own healthcare, industries, and land.
I urge you to act swiftly and decisively to stop Bill C-293 and ensure that Canadian policies are made by Canadians, for Canadians, free from foreign influence or overreach. The future of our nation’s sovereignty, autonomy, and economic freedom depends on it.
Again my question is: Will you stand with Canadians to Stop Bill C-293?
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your leadership in defending the rights of all Canadians and to your response to my concerns.
Kind Regards,
Connie Shields
mm
Summary of Bill C-293
C-293 MUST be DEFEATED because it is a comprehensive threat to Canada’s civil structure and our rights.
No term is defined and no power is limited. The grant of power is overly broad in the following ways:
1. The One Health Approach covers all sectors, and all disciplines (‘multisectoral,’ ‘multidisciplinary’). It covers ‘animal, human, plant and ecosystem health’ which purports to be everything in the natural world. It includes the ‘welfare Interface’ which is all of citizens’ interactions with government and asserts that everything is ‘central, to preventing future pandemics.’
2. There is no definition of pandemic.
3. The plan covers any ‘risk’ that ‘could lead’ to a pandemic, where risk is not defined and does not have to be a proximate or material cause.
4. It is geographically and jurisdictionally broad, impacting Canadians’ activities at home and abroad. Activities are not defined.
5. It has many other jurisdictional issues. The plan requires all levels of government and indigenous communities to overcome ‘jurisdiction challenges’ (which could include court’s jurisdiction, provincial jurisdictions, territorial jurisdiction, and indigenous treaty jurisdiction). Jurisdiction challenges are not defined.
6. Those in charge of the plan define the ‘state of research’ in order to establish interlinking surveillance systems which erode privacy.
7. Controllers determine the working conditions of employees across all sectors; manage (restrict access to) stockpiles and thus create a Soviet style command economy in which government controls all means of production and distribution.
8. Controllers define and manage ‘communication of risk to the public’ and therefore create and control the narrative without challenge. They set the ‘communications capacity; infrastructure for electronic platforms’; provide for elimination or reduction of meat production and consumption, and support investment in alternative proteins (e.g., bugs) instead.
9. Under the guise of reducing deforestation, the controllers determine land use in Canada, which has the power to expropriate rural, urban, agricultural and other lands and property from their owners.
10. It burdens Canadians with massive expenditures to address ‘global health equity’ and ‘global deforestation’ (aka agriculture).
11. C-293 allows the government of Canada to conclude agreements with organizations like WHO, UN Environment Program, Food and Agriculture Organization without public consultation, participation, or consent.
12. It allows for border measures such as “vaccine” passports and restriction of transportation.
13. It gives an additional unlimited, undefined grant of power to ‘the coordinator,’ allowing the Minister to ‘delegate to the coordinator powers, duties and functions that the Minister considers appropriate.’ None of these powers, duties, or functions is defined within this Act.
All powers granted by this Bill are broad, excessive and create jurisdictional issues. C-293 allows through ‘sustained collaboration’ (undefined), embedding of those in charge of this plan in all levels of government AND indigenous communities, all for the purpose of reducing an unquantified ‘risk,’ that ‘could cause’ an undefined event alleged to be an undefined pandemic.
14. C-293 grants these authorities to the Public Health Agency of Canada which, since the adoption of the 2005 International Health Regulations, has been a satellite office or focal point of the World Health Organization (WHO).
C-293 institutes a Marxist takeover of our country. The review committee is an irrelevant issue and a deceitful distraction from the purpose of this Bill, which is a severe infringement of rights on a grand scale.
All Senators must defeat this Bill. MPs must cross the floor to recall the Bill.
Provincial MLAs and Premieres need an immediate legal review of the broad jurisdictional assaults of this Federal Bill in order to pre-emptively go to Court to stop the operation of Bill C-293. The provinces must protect our rights when a Federal Bill has totalitarian reach into their Constitutional authority.
Canada as we know it, and love, will no longer exist with the enacting of C-293.
For more information:
https://PreventGenocide2030.org
m
Letter to Home Schooling Organisations and Parents
As a homeschooling parent and Child Psychiatrist, I am writing to alert you to a massive threat to every child in our society and to ask for your help.
Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) is vigorously pushed by national and international organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations and UNESO. Hard on the heels of the UN’s March 8, 2023 report normalizing pedophilia as an acceptable sexual alternative, the CSE explicitly emphasizes:
- Children are sexual from birth
- Teach young children lust and masturbation
- Sexual activity should begin as early as possible|
- Every child should have a sexual partner
- Children should learn to use online pornography
- HIV positive children do not have to disclose their HIV status to their sexual partner
- Use of protection is at the discretion of the HIV positive child
- Children can consent to sex at any age
- Every part of the curriculum should include CSE
- Doctors are only guessing when they say a baby is a boy or a girl
- Gender is a personal choice and is fluid
- Children are transgender from birth
- etc.
CSE tramples parental rights and rides rough shod over common decency and scientific accuracy.
CSE hyper-sexualizes children and overwhelms them with age-inappropriate stimulation, data and concepts. The resulting sexual and sexualizing trauma stunts emotional and psychosexual growth and development, replacing normal maturation with trauma-based hyper-sexualization.
No responsible educator or parent can countenance this destruction of parental rights and childhood needs, educating out deep human compassion and love and replacing them with boundless, casual hedonism. The stated intention is to reduce strong personal bonds and, hence, reproduction in these children.
This destructive assault on our children is part of WHO’s highly toxic social scheme for our future, as articulated in Agenda 21, now called Agenda 2030.
In addition to being a parent and child development expert, I am also the Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation, a Health Freedom advocacy organization founded in 2004.
If the parents in your organization are eager to protect their children from the broken and brutal future that WHO has laid out for them, it is imperative that they join the growing global movement to remove nations from WHO.
At https://PreventGenocide2030.org you will find tools to compel Congress to exit WHO immediately.
Happily, withdrawing from WHO requires only a letter from the Head of State. We must raise our voices in a roar, compelling Congress to protect our nation from this reprehensible globalist organization.
Substantiating documents at https://PreventGenocide.org/ourchildren. I must warn you that these documents contain graphic, offensive language and concepts. Feel free to reach out to me directly. I will be happy to meet with you, supporting your community in protecting your children.
Yours in Health and Freedom,